May 30, 2017 Pension Committee Meeting- May 12, 2017
Pension Committee Meeting- May 12, 2017
On May 12, 2017, GENMO’s Pension Review Committee—represented by Garry Marnoch—met with Dave Courtney, the financial analyst for our plan, and Ines Craviotto, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer for GMCC, to review the performance of the plan for the quarter ended December, and for the 2016 year.
Background to the discussion was the cheery thought that GMCC had its best sales year since 2008, which put us into a good mood.
The deck of information did not have the charts that display payments to pensioners versus contributions and earnings; however, the net was positive. This info is helpful and we hope to see it again in future. At the end of May the Actuarial Valuation for September 1, 2016 will be filed, and is expected to be a percent or so higher than the funded level of 85% for 2015. Although FSCO regulations allow actuarial valuations to be filed only every three years when 85% funding is maintained, GM is filing back to back years.
The salaried plan de-risking target is 60% high quality fixed investments, and its actual is almost there, at 59% bonds. There is an intention to introduce some flexibility into the ratio by hedging bonds to de-risk higher than the 60% target as discretion suggests.
Our fund returned 3.3% for the year, ahead of its benchmark 3.1%. However, in the final quarter it declined 2.3%, when its benchmark was negative 2.5%. Interest rates rose 33 basis points over the year, and 73 basis points in the fourth quarter. When interest rates go up, bond values decline, and we have 59% of our assets in high quality fixed investments. Although the fixed portion of our portfolio rose 2.9% over the year, it declined 5.6% in the final quarter. But when interest rates rise, the plan’s liabilities decline, all 100% of them. So the plan is better off.
A tenth of our plan is invested in real estate, and that did poorly, dragging down the overall performance. You may ask, how can one lose on Toronto real estate? But this is temporary; the loss is on valuation only, not real sales, and will rebound when the properties return to profitable uses.
The other asset classes outperformed their benchmarks, and the fund is in good shape.
November 9, 2016 Pension Committee Meeting October 28 2016
On October 28, Mike Powell and the writer met with Ines Craviotto, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance, and Dave Courtney, financial analyst for our pension plan, at GMCC's headquarters, to review the status of our pension plan for the quarter, in this case as of June 30, 2016. Also present was Kevin Tighe of Willis Towers Watson, actuarial consultant to GMCC. Though Hallowe'en was only three days away, the information was not very scary.
Not scary, but not exciting either. Although the plan return was positive overall, it fell short of the benchmark. The favourable performances within our portfolio were offset by Public Equities and Real Estate for the quarter and the two previous quarters. The fund managers are monitored on a regular basis to ensure they are meeting the fund's objective and turnover does occur. There are six asset classes in our plan, and fixed-income makes up 61% of the current asset mix. We are basically at the target of our de-risking strategy that has been pursued for four years. Return-seeking funds account for 39% of the whole. Low interest rates for the quarter continues the trend for the year, which increases liabilities, however, our de-risking strategy of high fixed income is helping to reduce the impact.
We sought clarification about some topics that have arisen in the meeting with GMCC executives August 25 or in conversations with GENMO members.
PYCB Prior Year Credit Balance
People outside GM including some politicians thought that when the governments bailed out GM with 4 billion dollars, the hourly and salaried plans must then be fully funded. Kevin detailed the use of the PYCB (Prior Year Credit Balance) from its inception in 2009 until it was used up by 2015. A deficit in any one year must be made up over the next five years. But a deficit in the next year has five years to be made good; and so on. The sponsoring company must make a minimum payment each year to work toward that target and is also allowed to use PYCB to offset funding obligations. To help GMCC through the financial turmoil, and provide cashflow certainty as pension contributions can vary greatly year to year, the governments negotiated that each minimum payment would come partly from GMCC and mostly from the PYCB for five years. The benefit of the up-front $720 million allowed growth in assets rather than spreading out that contribution over several years. All gone now; the PYCB has provided $720,200,000 and now GMCC makes the full annual minimum contributions.
Pension Benefit Guarantee Fund
Ontario backstops crumbling pension plans to a maximum of $1000 per month. But as part of the bailout negotiations, our salaried and hourly plans were excluded from this insurance plan. This saves GMCC about $14 million in annual premiums, based on the September 1, 2015 valuation results. The premiums would decrease over time as the funded status of the plans improves. To re-acquire this coverage, our plans have to reach full solvency funding for three consecutive year, which is highly unlikely to happen.
GM Canada Profitability
At the August 25 meeting, GMCC stated that GMCC managerially gets consolidated under GM North America (GMNA). As reported in GM's financial statements, GMNA's costs and breakeven point have been lowered and profits increased since the meltdown. But because GMCC is not a public company but part of a global corporation, there are no public documents that display performance for the Canadian subsidiary.
Sources of Pension Contributions
GENMO has been concerned about future contributions to the pension funds if manufacturing in Canada winds down. It was explained that contributions are made by GMCC and the business has three sources of revenue. The vast majority of GMCCs profits come ultimately from Marketing, the sale of vehicles. However, other activities receive "profit" from the Corporation as markups on their costs. Manufacturing and Engineering generate income on a cost-plus basis. These markups are arms' length returns and benchmarked on an annual basis.
June 21, 2016 Additional 2015 AV Information
Additional September 1, 2015 Actuarial Valuation Information
The expected lifetime of a participant who is aged 65 is 89.4 for a female and 86.9 for a male. There will be an update in the mortality assumptions in the next actuarial valuation.
There are 1,101 actives in the plan verses 1,139 in 2014 and 1,331 in 2013.
The number of participants receiving benefits in the plan is 7,174 in 2015 verses 7,306 in 2014. Their average ages are 75.0 and 74.3 respectively.
The average lifetime annual pension of the above is $22,963 in 2015.
It is assumed that 80% of the actives will take the commuted value when retiring.
We will be receiving a future actuarial valuation no later than September 1, 2016.
Information complémentaire au rapport de la valeur actuarielle du 1er septembre, 2015
L’espérance de vie d’un participant ayant 65 ans est de 89.4 pour une femme et de 86.9 pour un homme. Les valeurs d’espérance de vie seront ajustées dans le prochain rapport actuariel.
Il y a présentement 1,101 participants actifs dans le plan vs 1,139 en 2014 et 1,331en 2013
Le nombre de participants recevant des bénéfices en 2015 est de 7,174 vs 7306 en 2014. Leur âge moyen est de 75.0 et de 74.3 respectivement.
La pension à vie annuelle moyenne était de $22,963 en 2015.
On pense que 80% des futurs retraités prendront le montant la valeur actuarielle lors de leur pension.
Un autre rapport actuariel nous sera soumis au plus tard le 1er Septembre 2016.
May 15, 2016 Pension Committee Meeting May 4 2016
On May 4th, GENMO members Mike Powell and Garry Marnoch met with Dave Courtney, financial analyst for our pension plan, and Ines Craviotto, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance, at GMCC's headquarters. We reviewed charts as of the end of the fourth quarter 2015 summarizing performance of the several asset categories.
In keeping with the strategy to derisk the pension plan there were modest gains in most investments offset by real estate resulting in modest overall yields for the quarter, but below benchmarks. Five-year returns at 9.3% are good and exceed the benchmark.
The overall performance was encouraging in that the combined pension contributions and performance exceeded the payout from the plan in the period.
Although more than half of new retirees take commuted value—to the detriment of plan funding—there are far fewer of them since the full health-care coverage window closed last June.
By the end of the year, the salaried funded status had improved vs. 2014. So the tone of our meeting was positive throughout.
Mise à jour de notre Régime de Pension- Mai 2016
Le 4 Mai, Mike Powell et Garry Marnoch, membres de GENMO, ont eu un entretien avec Dave Courtney, analyste financier pour notre régime de pension, et Ines Craviotto, responsable des finances et Vice-Président finances, au siège social de GMCC. Nous avons repassé les tableaux à la fin du quatrième trimestre 2015 illustrant les résultats des différentes catégories d’actifs.
Suite à notre stratégie de minimiser les risques pour notre régime de pension, de faibles gains ont été enregistrés pour la plupart des investissements, mais réduits par les biens immobiliers, résultant en de faibles gains pour le 4ième trimestre, mais sous les objectifs. Les résultats sur 5 ans à 9.3% sont bons et dépassent l’objectif.
L’ensemble des résultats est encourageant du au fait que la somme des contributions au régime et les résultats des investissements dépassent les montant payés par le plan pour la même période.
Même si plus de la moitié des nouveaux retraités prennent le montant actualisé – au détriment de la capitalisation du régime – il y a beaucoup moins de ceux-ci depuis que la couverture médicale complète a cessé en Juin dernier.
Par la fin de l’année, le taux de capitalisation s’était amélioré vs. 2014. Ce qui a fait que notre réunion s’est déroulée sur une note positive.
April 27, 2016 Candidates for GENMO Director - 2016 to 2018
(4 positions available)
Denise Cay (current Director)
Alanna Lyczba (current Director)
Mike Black (current Director)
Mike Powell (current Director)
May 25, 2015 Pension Update May 2015
Dave Courtney, of GMCL Finance met with Mike Powell and Garry Marnoch of GENMO on May 13, 2015 to consider fund performance in the last quarter of 2014. Joining us for the first time was the new Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Ines Craviotto.
The quarter ended as it began. Interest rates have been predicted to rise, but have not, which impacts the size of pension liabilities, but asset returns have been good, at 4.11%, so the funding status is stable.
2014 was a good year. In 2013, benefits payouts (including commuted value acceptances) exceeded income, but in 2014 asset returns more than offset the payouts, so the market value of the fund is higher than at the opening of 2013. Almost all the fund categories in the salaried portfolio outperformed their benchmarks, for a combined performance 33 basis points above the combined benchmark; this offset impact resulting from continuing low interest rates. (Our salaried plan outperformed the benchmark for 9 of the last 10 quarters, and 14 of the last 20.) "Emerging Markets" was slightly negative, but we are divesting this category. Canadian Equities was down 0.8% for the quarter, but for the year was positive 9.1%.
The Annual Valuation will be completed by the end of May. Since the financial crisis, our fund has moved to a more conservative investment profile, from about 80% invested in equities to around 45% currently. This means that we will not realize flashy gains as the market recovers, when compared to other plans. But we are a closed group; there will be no new members receiving defined benefit pensions from GMCL. So the important thing is to maintain the ability to meet the pension payments owed to members of this group, not to strive for overly risky returns that could imperil current payouts.
GMCL continues to make its required contributions to the fund, and plans to do so after the Prior Year Credit Balance (provided by the governments during the Bailout) gets used up. This commitment was stated again by Steve Carlisle at the General Motors Salaried Pensioners Association meeting May 12, at which he was the featured speaker.
November 12, 2014 Pension Update November 2014
Quarterly Review of Retirement Plan with GMCL Financial
On Friday November 7, 2014 Mike Powell and Garry Marnoch met with Dave Courtney at GMCL Headquarters to review the status of the pension plan for the quarter ending June 30, 2014.
Assets in the plan increased slightly since December 31, 2013, and stand at $11.3 billion. Payouts were higher than last year because of the number of folks who opted for retirement by June to capture benefits in retirement, who also chose commuted value instead of pension payments. The remainder of the year will see much less of that, so payouts will trend down to a normal rate.
Overall fund performance for the quarter was 2.8% overall return, slightly less than the benchmark; most of the folders in the portfolio were similar. Calendar year-to-date was quite good, and one-year performance was excellent at 12.9% return for the salaried plan (and favourable to the benchmark). Five-year returns look good, now that the awful year of 2008 has fallen off the chart. For the seven quarters prior to this last, the fund managers taken together have bettered the benchmark One underperforming management firm has been dropped.
The GMAM policy for asset mix that was approved in February was completed by October. To date the salaried and hourly plans have shared the same asset mix, which minimizes management fees. However, the salaried plan is closed, there will be no new participants, so we anticipate asset mix differences in the future in keeping with the now less risky profile of the Salary plan.
Interest rates have for some time been unhistorically low; at some point they will have to rise. Dave showed a graph which displayed how a small increase in the prevailing rate increases by hundreds of millions of dollars the ability of our fund to meet its future commitments.
In summary, a weak quarter but a good year.
September 21, 2014 USSC Restructuring
You may have heard that US Steel Canada (was STELCO) filed to restructure September 16. Their filing provides an excellent example of what is wrong with the Ontario Pension Benefit Act and the Federal Business and Insolvency Act (BIA) and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). It is, unfortunately, a scenario that we may be facing in the next few years.
The following message has been delivered to the people GENMO members have been meeting with over the last year; including all three levels of government, the Ministry of Finance and the media.
With US Steel Canada (USSC) filing for restructuring under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) this week after apparently attempting to shed pension obligations through the Canada Business Corporations Act (CBCA) this summer, it is timely to recap our concerns.
USSC faced decline sales, lack of modernization investment and significant “legacy costs” such as pensions and benefit programs. The very issues we outlined to you that GM Canada faces.
Both USSC and GM Canada are wholly owned subsidiaries of US companies; the shares of the companies are US shares. Early reports show USSC shares have increased 10% which leads one to believe the US markets see restructuring or bankruptcy of foreign subsidiaries to shed legacy costs to be good business strategy.
As with GM Canada’s pension plan USSC’s pension plan is underfunded; reportedly USSC by $838.7 million, GM Canada by $3.5 billion.
USSC puts at risk some 14,000 pensioners, pensioners now facing reductions in their monthly pension cheques; even though their pension is considered deferred earnings. GM Canada puts at risk some 45,000 pensioners.
The impact of reduced pensions is felt Municipally, Provincially and Federally. Solving the problems is the responsibility of the Provincial and Federal governments.
The Ontario Pension Benefits Act needs to be strengthened to protect the pension plan members. Simply put, plan members are entitled to their deferred earnings and it is the responsibility of the government to ensure this through legislation. The widespread underfunding of pensions demonstrates that this current legislation and enforcement is not accomplishing this. Companies must be induced to fully fund their pension plans. We have outlined some proposals to address this.
There is a need to add options for the treatment of pensions abandoned through restructuring and bankruptcy. Today, they must be annuitized. We know from the NORTEL experience that the Canadian annuity market is simply not large enough to handle these large numbers. Estimates are that it will take five to seven years to annuitize the NORTEL pensions; some 12,000 pensioners. Adding 14,000 USSC pensioners to this limited market is not likely practical. Adding 45,000 GM Canada pensioners would be catastrophic. We have outlined some proposals to address this.
As more large companies restructure the exclusion of GM Canada pensioners from the Ontario Pension Benefits Guarantee Fund (PBGF) becomes very troubling. Recently Algoma and USSC have filed, we have explained our concerns with GM Canada. Note that these were three of the companies that took advantage of Regulation 5.1; “Too big to fail”. GM Canada pensioners should be covered by the PBGF.
The federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and CCAA prioritize pension solvency deficiencies so low as to virtually ensure there are no assets to fund them. GENMO, as a member of the Canadian Federation of Pensioners has provided input to the Industry Minister’s review of the BIA and CCAA covering four points; Give effect to the pension deemed trusts created under federal and provincial legislation in all insolvency proceedings, Grant pensioners priority over secured creditors to amounts covered by a deemed trust, no matter when the security was granted to the lenders, Ensure the pension deemed trusts are given effect even if the plan is wound-up after the insolvency proceedings have commenced and If Parliament is unwilling to make such changes, extend the secured priority ranking that currently applies to unpaid normal costs today to all amounts owing to the plan.
The CCAA filing of USSC should compel governments to address the pension issues, and act as a warning of what could happen in the future.
August 20, 2014 Pension Update August 2014
Dear GENMO Member:
You recently received an “Update to Members regarding Plan Funding” from General Motors of Canada. This note applies to everyone’s pension. No matter when you retired, no matter what program, no matter whether you were in the class for the benefits law suit or not; the pension issues apply to you.
GENMO continues to represent you and your pension issues with politicians, government agencies, and GM. No one else does.
Unfortunately the message has not changed very much since last year.
Just as last year the message is: • Your pension is underfunded • GMCL does not have a plan to fully fund the pension • GMCL is committed to paying the lowest amount possible into the plan
Our pension's wind up ratio has improved to 82.6% from 75.4%. The windup ratio is the percentage of pension obligations the plan could cover if the plan ceased operations; this is the key ratio to focus on. Another important point is that while the wind up ratio is 82.6% if there was a restructuring or bankruptcy there would be additional costs that would reduce that number.
Certainly good news, but as we discussed at the Annual General Meeting on May 22, 2014, better isn't good enough. As part of the bailout agreement we lost Pension Benefit Guarantee Fund (PBGF) coverage. The PBGF is an Ontario government pension insurance program. If we were covered, the PBGF would pay us $200 - 300 per month to offset some of the reduction in a bankruptcy situation. To regain coverage, our pension has to be 100% funded for three consecutive years.
Further, GM has committed to making only the minimum pension contribution since 2009. This has resulted in our pension experiencing solvency deficiencies four of the past five years.
The note refers to changes GM Canada negotiated in 2009 with the Province of Ontario as part of the bailout. Changes that were largely detrimental to us and with no participation from the salaried retirees; we had no voice.
Once again we would like to clarify a couple of points here.
First the $200 million annual payment was negotiated as GM Canada’s maximum pension contribution from operations to the two pension plans; hourly and salary. The calculated minimum contribution is much higher.
Second, the difference has been funded from that $720.2 million mentioned (the $720.2 is the portion allocated to the salary plan of the total $4 billion Prior Year Credit Balance created in 2009). The Prior Year Credit Balance will be essentially $0 at the end of this year at which time GM Canada will have to rely on operations for the full pension contribution to both plans.
In the memo there is a statement "If the Plan were wound-up, GMCL would be required to fully fund the wind-up liabilities ..." This does not mean that our pension is safe should GMCL go bankrupt. What is left out of this statement is that it assumes GMCL would have cash and/or assets to fully fund at wind-up. Right now the wind up ratio is 82.6%. As the NORTEL retirees have experienced, there is usually no money left when it comes to dealing with a pension shortfall.
GENMO continues to advocate addressing our pension issues.
If you know GMCL salaried retirees who are not members of GENMO, please send them this note. They too need to understand how fragile our pension is.
No one else is protecting our pension. We need to.
Brian Rutherford, Mike Powell, Lynn McCullough, Jan O’Neill, Mike Black, Denise Cay, Garry Marnoch, Alanna Lyczba
July 13, 2014 Pension Update July 2014
How's your GMCL Pension doing?
While we haven't yet received GM Canada's letter concerning the status of our pension, it has come up in an article in the Globe & Mail of June 24, 2014.
While we can't verify all of the numbers in Greg Keenan's article, it seems basically correct. The wind up ratio has improved, the Prior Year Credit Balance (PYCB) is being drained, and the pension fund still has a large deficit.
Our pension's wind up ratio has improved to 83% from 75%. Certainly good news, but as we discussed at the Annual General Meeting on May 22, 2014, better isn't good enough. As part of the bailout agreement we lost our Pension Benefit Guarantee Fund (PBGF) coverage. IF we were covered, the PBGF would pay us $300 - 400 per month to offset some of the reduction in a bankruptcy situation. To regain coverage, our pension has to be 100% funded for three consecutive years.
At the 2013 AGM, based on 2011 data, we forecast that the PYCB would be about $150 million for the salaried pension in the 2013 report (just released), it is $187 million and on a glide path to be 0 in 2015. The combined pension deficit (salary and hourly) is over $3 billion, a significant number.
Our pension issues are far from resolved. GENMO continues to be pro-active to protect your pension. We to meet with MP’s, MPP’s, municipal politicians, FSCO (the pension regulator), The Ministry of Finance, the Finance Minister's Office, GM Canada, the media, etc .
We will continue to hope for the best but plan for the worst.
Thank you for your support.
May 20, 2014 May 12, 2014 Pension Plan Review
On May 12, GENMO director Garry Marnoch met with Dave Courtney to review performance of our plan for the quarter ending December 31, 2013. Not present was the new Vice-President of Finance, Ines Craviotto, who just succeeded Jeff Rolfs, a usual participant at these reviews. Ines comes to Canada after spending several years as CFO of GM Mexico and she has also spent time at the New York Treasurer’s Office. Also absent was GENMO VP Mike Powell who was meeting with retirees in St. Catharines.
Over the last year, the value of the assets in the combined hourly and salaried plans havedropped because return on investment and contributions did not cover the payouts. We are in the period of maximum benefit payouts. Because the Defined Benefit class is closed, the number of members can only decrease going forward, and payouts will drop from today's high point.
The latest adjustment to the asset categories was approved in February, as GMAM continues to balance types of investments to best meet long-range pension plan goals. As an example,there was a reduction of Canadian equities and an increase in US equities to better balance to world marketweightings. Fixed income investments have not changed, but the direction will be to exit long-term US corporate bonds and retain only Canadian long-term corporate bonds. The de-risking that has been applied to our plan does not take full advantage of short-tern equity gains but seeks long-term stability, and avoidance of precipitous declines as in 2008.
The quarter was good to the plan. All equities advanced very well, with the US component leading the way and Europe also extemely strong. Emerging markets and private equity showed acceptably, but not spectacularly. Most bond categories held pretty well flat for the quarter, after declining over the year because of rising interest rates; although US high-yield bonds returned very well for the quarter and okay for the year. The Absolute Return Strategy envelope gives fund managers some latitude to make investment decisions, and they did very well for the quarter, okay for the year.
Most asset categories slightly outperformed their benchmarks. Canadian real estate and private equity slightly underperformed. GMAM watches the performance of all the fund managers and makes reassignments when trends are detected, not just because of single quarter performance.
In February, GMAM received a new CEO, Dhivya Suryadevara.
The annual valuation of hourly and salary plan funding will be presented to the pension regulator FSCO by May 30. Because of the generally favourable year, we might anticipate a reduction in the level of underfunding.
February 4, 2014 Pension Committee Meeting January 6, 2014
On January 6,
2014, your pension plan subcommittee, consisting of Mike Powell and Garry
Marnoch, met with Dave Courtney--Employment Cost Analysis Manager, and Jeff
Rolfs--Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer to review the performance
of our pension plan for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.
pension fund is slowly improving.
third quarter the plan assets decreased by $339 million as payments from
the plan exceeded the income from investments and contributions from
GMCL. As of the 9/1/12 valuation, the solvency ratio is 76% of liabilities.
With rising interest rates and good asset returns we expect that the 9/1/13
filing will show improvement.
The GM Canada salaried pension plan continues to beat
the benchmarks in most investment categories. Overall there was a 1.3%
return for the third quarter with an annual return of 2.6%.
This topped the overall benchmark by 0.2% for the quarter and 0.7%
annually. The planoutperformed the benchmarks for the last five
quarters, and for nine of the most recent eleven quarters. Virtually
break-even to benchmark performance in the five-year view continues to
reflect the market collapse of 2008-9 and will drop out of the calculations as
the window moves forward.
positive development is that there has been a significant improvement in
investment performance stability. When investing for pensions, stability
is critical, and has improved significantly since 2008. Stability is the
purpose of the derisking strategy adopted for the plan since the financial
October 6, 2013 Pension Committee Meeting September 23, 2013
On September 23, the GENMO pension plan subcommittee met with Dave Courtney our contact in the Finance Department, and Jeff Rolfs, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, to review the performance of our Pension Plan for the quarter ending June 30, 2013. GENMO was represented by Lynn McCullough, Mike Powell and Garry Marnoch. Mike will be replacing Lynn in these reviews going forward.
The overall return is down nearly two percent over the quarter, carried down by rising interest rates which negatively affect bonds. The fund has moved toward less risky instruments, and benefited during the three years that interest rates were expected to rise but did not. The rising interest rate increases the discount rate which is used to determine the plan's liabilities, thus decreasing the overall liabilities at a greater rate than the bond asset drop.
Mitigating the bond fund performance were the various equity funds, which went up quite a bit, and even those that declined still performed better than their benchmarks in a declining market. Although the Canadian real estate asset category increased in absolute numbers, it underperformed the benchmark because of a single project. Replacing fund managers and rebalancing asset categories are not based on performance in a single quarter but with a view to long-term stability in the capacity of the fund to meet its payout obligations.
The one-year, three-year and ten-year views are quite favourable and exceeded their benchmarks. The five-year view is positive but not as strong, and underperforms its benchmark slightly. As the effect of the 2008-9 market collapse drops out of the calculation, expect to see the five-year picture brighten.
Benefits paid out of the plan during the quarter were way up over the previous year. This may be attributed to GMCL's offer to take commuted value in place of regular pension payments; the offer has been extended to all futureretirees, not just those involved in special shutdowns. For those who accept, their full commuted value comes out of the underfunded pension plan. This may be expected to continue until drainage to the fund reaches the regulatory limit. In future, benefitpayments from the fund will decline, for there will be no new participants now that all active employees have been switched to the Defined Contribution programme.
June 13, 2013 Pension Committee Meeting June 12, 2013
Attendees- Jeff Rolfs- Vice President Finance and CFO, David Courtney- Employment Cost Analysis Manager, Lynn McCullough- GENMO
We reviewed our pension plan fund performance for the first quarter of 2013.
Overall, the funds performed very well in the first quarter with our asset managers beating the benchmarks for similar funds with every fund except one.This was a very impressive performance by our fund mangers, very probably due to GM holding them highly accountable.In fact in the past three quarters our overall plan has beaten the benchmarks.
The investment returns and contributions well exceeded pension benefit payouts again.
The market value of our assets went up by 3%, mainly due to US equities jumping about 14% in the first quarter.
The performance of our sizeable bond funds was down as interest rates were up slightly but as interest rates go up the pension plan liability goes down.
The yearly members update for pension plan funding will be sent out shortly by GMCL.Although the plan is performing well, the falling discount rate which forces up the plan liabilities is having an adverse affect on the both the transfer ratio and windup ratio.
June 4, 2013 Court Case Summary May 27, 28 & 29 2013
The Summary Judgment motion for our class action lawsuit was held at Osgoode Hall, Toronto on May 27, 28 and 29.It was initially scheduled for two days but the arguments were long and contentious requiring an additional two hour session on the third day.
Justice Belobaba ensured that both the plaintiff (retirees) and defendant (GMCL) had sufficient time to make their arguments and treated each quite fairly.That’s all that we can ask of a judge.
We appreciate the high number of interested GENMO members who attended on all three days and provided overwhelming support.
Note that a British Columbia case which is quite similar to ours, Lacey verses Weyerhaeuser, was settled on May 28 at the BC Court of Appeal in favour of Lacey (retiree).It was an issue and probably favourable in our case as we used it as a precedent.
We are cautiously optimistic because of the excellent performance by our law firm (SGM) and the recent BC decision.We have no doubt that our three lawyers (Christine Davies, Louis Sokolov and Steven Barrett) did a tremendous job.Their knowledge of our documents, their research into precedents and their ability to counter GMCL’s arguments were outstanding.
Justice Belobaba will deliver a decision in mid-July.
Thank you for your support.If you know of anyone who’s not a member of GENMO please recommend that they join.We will make a difference.
Your GENMO Executive
Brian Rutherford, Lynn McCullough, Mike Powel, Jan O’Neill, Jo Ann Stuart, Garry Marnoch, Doug McDowell, Denise Cay, Alanna Lyczba